What are your early impressions of using a blog and what was your experience using an RSS Reader this week? Any surprises, pleasant, or otherwise?
I find using a blog interesting. I like that people can comment and everyone can see this. I also like that you can link different sites to the blog. Compared to a Wiki, a blog would be better when you want people's input, but you don't want information changed.
The RSS Reader seems very different to me. I see it more as a way to gain knowledge than explain your own knowledge. I like being able to sift through information quickly and getting the "headlines" before deciding what I actually want to read completely. The very first day I looked at the RSS Reader I didn't like it at all because it felt too overwhelming. Looking back at it a couple times has helped me see how I can use different tools to guide what I look at and review.
Which part(s) of Dale's Cone do you think each tool (Blog, RSS) lends itself best to and why?
I think that the Blog fits into the "Direct Purposeful Experience" if you are creating your own blog. For example, in our class this was a direct, purposeful experience because I didn't just watch a video on this, but created a blog for the first time. I don't just know what a blog is, but know how to use/access/and control a blog. At the same time, reading a blog would be a visual symbol. The letters symbolize words that we string together with previous knowledge.
I see the RSS Reader fitting into the category of exhibits. You can interact with the RSS Reader, but you aren't really creating anything new. Just as Cone says in an exhibit you may turn a crank and this would allow you to gain more knowledge. Using a RSS Reader you may say you like something or mark it as unread, which will increase your knowledge of how to use the RSS Reader. It does not mean you now understand what you are reading. You are gathering information. This reminds me of when I go to a museum and I look at three different exhibits. While looking through RSS Reader feeds I see headlines, unless I choose to click on and read more. When I choose to do this I get a new, visual representation of what I'm looking at. The RSS Reader could be looked at as just a visual symbol also because most of this is reading. I don't think etiher the blog or RSS Reader fit into specifically one category. It depends on how they are used and what their purpose is for each individual.
Considering Seigel's concept of "computer imganation", what do you think would be at least one "imaginative" educational use of each tool (Blog, RSS) that takes advantage of each tool's inherent strengths? That is, what do you think you and/or your students could use these tools for that they might not be able to do with other more simple or low-tech tools? Or, as Postman might ask, what is a problem to which each of these tools is an answer?
At the grade level I teach (3rd), I think the Blog would be used best for discussing matters with parents. For example, I think with parents it would be nice to post information about an upcoming field trip. If I put on there I can have up to four chaperones the parents can begin to comment saying they would like to chaperone. Then, parents know when I get to the fourth chaperone without me having to choose between parents. Another thing a parent could do is say they will be a fifth chaperone and can drive if that is the reason for the limited number of parents. I think this works best because unlike a Wiki I would not want parents to be able to edit my posting, but I would want them to be able to see each other's comments. This is a benefit of a blog.
The RSS would be best used in the classroom as a research tool. They could subscribe to news to gain current events. In my classroom, this seems much harder to utlize because of tight curriculum constraints. It might be good for students to look at current events in Michigan with the race for Governor coming since michigan history is a grade level content expectation for third grade. I don't think I would use RSS often in the classroom, but as a teacher I would use this more to gain information. I can pick and choose topics that are broader than doing a normal Google search so it would be helpful when I want a range of information on one topic. This is especially true when I know I want to continue checking on something because then it is all compacted into one site. I also like that I can get information on books through this. As a teacher and a reader I like getting good book ideas without having to know titles of books.
Here are some interesting feeds I found from Google Reader:
Book Review - The Facebook Effect - By David Kirkpatrick: "A fascinating history of Facebook, and a thoughtful analysis of the Web site’s impact.
Federal government eying free lunches for all students in high-poverty areas, rules for vending machines: "The federal government could soon be paying for lunch for entire communities of children under a new plan in the U.S. House of Representatives. The plan also would create rules for vending machines and dictate training for food service directors.